What Is in the Greek and Roman Art Wing at the Metropolitan Museum of Art
Art Review
Classical Treasures, Bathed in a New Lite
The other day, apropos of the Metropolitan Museum's fine, new light-washed galleries for Greek and Roman art, a friend east-mailed to me a passage by Virgil. In it Aeneas, fleeing the Trojan War, arrives in Carthage and finds a temple for Juno under construction. He pushes open the temple'southward large bronze doors ("which fabricated the hinges groan," Virgil reports) and "for the get-go time he dared to hope for life." He's astounded by the skill of the craftsmen and past the dignity and precision of a painting of the war. He starts to cry.
"Information technology was only a movie, but, sighing deeply, he let his thoughts feed on it, and his face was wet with a stream of tears," Virgil writes.
The power of ancient art has to do with its power, as my friend put information technology, "to embody great acts and communicate their human dimension." Rome became the model for Western culture from the Renaissance through the Enlightenment.
I'm not certain exactly when its pre-eminence began to fade, but in 1949 a young, populist Met director named Francis Henry Taylor decided to turn the Roman court, the literal and symbolic climax of the building's southern wing, into a eating place, which devolved into a cafeteria. Plenty of New Yorkers grew upwards learning from this arrangement that eating a nutted cheese sandwich at Brimming total o'Basics before going to the museum was a thriftier option than buying a tuna sandwich once you lot got there.
It was a life lesson, just not the kind that Virgil wrote about.
Fortunately, now, abreast the humongous column from the Temple of Artemis at Sardis, which marked the entrance to the cafeteria, where mobs used to crane their necks looking not like Aeneas for hope and inspiration but for the beef stew, y'all can instead gaze up at huge architectural fragments from the same temple, including one with the sort of egg-and-dart molding that inspired the Met's facade by Richard Morris Hunt.
Paradigm
Like endless public institutions in America, the Met aped Rome considering Rome stood for civic order, empire and reason. Greek and Roman art weren't the only historic arts of consequence, a lesson the museum taught long before it became fashionable to disparage classical civilization. Only Rome was a standard against which to measure other cultures, including our ain.
Western artists e'er had, from Michelangelo, who aspired to equal the Dais body, to Picasso, whose "Adult female in White" at the Met is unimaginable without classical fine art. Going from the Greek and Roman galleries to the Picasso is something y'all tin can just do at that place. Willem de Kooning and Arshile Gorky used to haunt these galleries during the 1930s and '40s and loved the Pompeiian frescoes, whose influence y'all can see in their works, not far away.
Those frescoes, from luxurious ancient villas on the Bay of Naples, have been cleaned and moved from the museum foyer, where tourists used to mistake them for the coat-bank check concession. They are reinstalled next to the Roman courtroom, where they look magnificent. I hadn't noticed until lately all the phalluses on the rooftops of the fantasy buildings, painted in cinnabar and blue, which decorate the murals from a sleeping room buried by Vesuvius. The opulence of these scenes suggests something of what inspired Aeneas.
The court, with its burbling fountain, is the centerpiece of the new galleries, which officially open today, and it's a terrific gift to New York, a vast, skylighted, airy new public space, chilly with all the newly scrubbed marble and naked light but aptly lofty.
Video
More Video »
It would be incorrect to say that everything on view is wonderful. There are garden-multifariousness sculptures from Roman baths and archaeological fragments more meaningful to specialists than to the balance of us, along with imperial portrait busts, funerary reliefs and the Badminton sarcophagus, whose reputation belies the fact that information technology's a fleck over the top. The Met'south Greek and Roman collection is enormous just not similar the collections in Athens, Rome, Naples, London, Paris or Berlin, built effectually stupendous masterworks.
Video
You can say, though, that it tells the whole story. With the Greek galleries, finished 8 years ago, Western antiquity from the Bronze Age through the reign of Constantine now unfolds in logical, stately social club, every bit was intended from the museum'south early days. Thousands of objects have been exhumed from storage (it'southward about time) and blithe by new touch-screen computers (useful up to a point) and by air and dominicus.
In total there are 57,000 square feet of exhibition space for classical antiquity, around xxx,000 for Rome alone, equivalent to all the galleries at the Whitney Museum combined. You tin can go out Rome into African art then go directly into mod art, which depended on both Rome and Africa for utterly different ideas about the human being torso.
That itinerary, richly detailed and arrived at over the years as the Met evolved, argues strongly for the universal museum — the encyclopedic collection, modeled after Diderot — a concept lately assaulted past lawyers, archaeologists and advocates of nationalism.
I'm with the philosopher Kwame Anthony Appiah on this score. Looted art, proved as stolen, must exist repatriated. But just in a narrow legal sense does patrimony necessarily vest to modernistic states occupying lands where ancient cultures one time were. The Taliban demonstrated how dubious that claim may exist when they blew up the Bamiyan Buddhas in Transitional islamic state of afghanistan.
Respect for other cultures tin can come not simply from returning an object to where it came from simply as well from "holding onto it considering you value information technology yourself," Mr. Appiah has written. My epistolary friend sent me a second e-mail message. In 1430, he pointed out, the Italian humanist and book hunter Poggio Bracciolini caused some Greek sculptures by the slap-up Polyclitus and Praxiteles. A caput of Bacchus, Bracciolini told a boyfriend classical devotee, "ought to feel one thousand, for if he deserves lodging anywhere information technology is certainly in my state, where he is peculiarly worshiped." Bracciolini fifty-fifty enlisted Donatello to check out his Greek collection.
The indicate is that objects take one meaning to those who made them, others to those who find or purchase them centuries later, and yet other meanings for those who come upon them in a museum. Their dissimilar careers ensure immortality. Rise nationalism is an alarming trend equally far as this goes. Archeologists who at present argue that antiquities are better served in the clay where they came from than dispersed among public museums like the Met imply that they prefer the by remain dead and buried. The terminal thing Italian republic needs today is another Roman vase.
Philippe de Montebello, the Met director, has ofttimes described his museum as a "cultural family unit tree in which every visitor tin find his roots." Truthful enough, notwithstanding the implicit imperialism. The legacy of Rome is shared past endless people who become to the museum, and not just by modern-twenty-four hour period Italians.
Fulfilling a plan initiated past his predecessor, Thomas Hoving, Mr. de Montebello has done the Met and the city — and everybody — incalculable good by pushing through this project, which in so many means goes against the grain. It's not about celebrity architecture. Information technology's not politically correct. The timing is awful, since so much attention is focused on annexation. But it is about reiterating an platonic for art and for the museum, most extolling the collection, which is the public's heritage, seen by millions, and about doing the hard thing because it is right.
Did I neglect to mention the art? Well, virtue earlier pleasure, since Rome has been the field of study. Here are a couple of works in the new galleries you might overlook, then you can have information technology from there. The Etruscan drove on the mezzanine, one of the best in the world, with the famous chariot lately restored, is splendid, but tucked abroad in the dorsum is a tiny miracle of antique etching, a chunk of glowing bister, that is easy to miss. It's in the shape of a man and woman entwined. He reclines beside her, holding her in his arms. She's reclining too, wearing a pointy chapeau and holding a small vase in 1 hand, gently touching its mouth with her other manus, as if nigh to cascade something perhaps. Possibly information technology'southward a love potion. Shades of Tristan and Isolde.
And in what's chosen the Hellenistic Treasury, at that place'due south a figurine of a dancer wearing a mask. Information technology's a small statuary sculpture, not nine inches alpine, the Isadora Duncan of ancient Alexandria. Draped in layers, she twists like a corkscrew, her body — the curve of her dorsum, her buttocks and muscled thighs — outlined by the taut fabric. The thinnest veil hides her face, and her caput tilts discreetly behind one shoulder, a slippered foot emerging, suggestively, from beneath her robes.
She's all virtuosity and grace. You lot can detect in sculptures past Matisse and Richard Serra the influence of her torqued, complicated eloquence, transformed and transmuted through intermediaries like Borromini and Canova.
If you want to know why Greek and Roman art matters eternally, she's your answer.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/20/arts/design/20anci.html
0 Response to "What Is in the Greek and Roman Art Wing at the Metropolitan Museum of Art"
Post a Comment